Bring the current website contact journey and the receiving destination authorised by the business. Describe the minimum context staff need to respond. Review a visitor who prepares a message and sends it, one who edits it first and one who closes the application without sending. Those cases help choose honest website wording without requiring a real customer message during development.
If a platform integration is requested, identify the actual business account and the person authorised to review it. Access, provider configuration and live execution remain separate project steps. An existing portfolio contact path is useful design evidence, but it cannot establish that a new account is approved or that an API message has been delivered.
During remote review, the Mumbai owner approves the message purpose and receiving arrangements while our Ranchi team presents the visitor journey. The acceptance record should say whether it proves a prepared message, an opened conversation or an actual received request. Retain that distinction in the handover so future editors do not change a button label into a promise the implementation cannot substantiate.