Imagine a hypothetical business approving a short moving brand reveal. The mark becomes recognisable near the end, but the proposed still for a paused or non-playing placement comes from an early frame containing only a decorative shape. Someone reviewing that still cannot identify the company. This is an illustrative identity brief, not a Lucknow project or a delivered video claim.
The design review considers the intended uses together. The approved static mark is retained; the selected reveal reaches an intelligible hold or end composition; and an appropriate still is prepared where the commission includes one. The team inspects ordinary business wording at the actual output size rather than judging only a large animation preview.
The handover distinguishes those supplied files from publishing and playback behaviour. If another team builds the website or assembles the video, it receives the agreed source or export assets and the relevant usage instructions. If technical fallback behaviour is required, it is implemented and checked as a separate part of that project. The identity asset review alone does not establish accessibility, browser behaviour or a channel result.