Imagine a hypothetical business selecting an identity direction on screen. The same colour is then used in a proposal PDF and in artwork for a printed handout. The screen presentation looks familiar, but the physical production proof looks different. This is an illustrative design brief, not a Rajkot project or a measured colour result.
The reviewers identify the intended outputs and compare them using the appropriate references. They ask the printer for the production requirements and agree who approves its proof. The designer may need to prepare a suitable output treatment within the commission. A screen colour value is not used as a blanket guarantee for every material and process.
The final guidance records the selected treatment and the supplied files for each agreed use. A later supplier can understand what was approved and which new production condition needs another review. This practical decision supports the wider identity system; it does not replace the positioning, mark, typography or application design that the business is commissioning.